The Net Energy Cliff

There’s a lot of talk about the US fiscal cliff at the moment. This is a pretty short-sighted problem in my view – what everyone should really be concerned about is the net energy cliff.

A report came out today called “On the Road to Zero Growth” by Jeremy Grantham. It has some pretty thought-provoking calculations, like the following for instance;

The price rise might even accelerate as cheap resources diminish. If resources increase their costs at 9% a year, the U.S. will reach a point where all of the growth generated by the economy is used up in simply obtaining enough resources to run the system. It would take just 11 years before the economic system would be in reverse! If, on the other hand, our resource productivity increases, or demand slows, cost increases may decelerate to 5% a year, giving us 31 years to get our act together. Of course, with extraordinary, innovative breakthroughs we might do even better, but we certainly shouldn’t count on that. (Bear in mind that we don’t even know precisely why the prices started to rise so sharply in 2000.) Excessive optimism and doing little could be extremely dangerous. 1 All references to GDP growth are expressed in real terms.

For those unaware – the problem is energy is that we are living at a point in time when we are having to use exponentially more energy to get the produce the same amount of energy as before.

Jg Letterall 11-12

Star Citizen

I’ve been forgetting to post about this for like a week now, but basically if you don’t support this game by throwing your money at the developer, you are a filthy dirty casual who should never touch video games.

http://www.robertsspaceindustries.com/star-citizen/

Mai Waifu

>tfw no average korean gf. Clearly I need to get masters on the korean server.

On a very related note, how good is flash at MLG? I bet he wins the championship tomorrow. Terrans need a new hero, given how incredibly OP and imba zerg and protoss totally are, and the fact that Mvp is barely alive.

The debate on negative gearing heats up

For those outside of Australia (or economically illiterate in Australia), negative gearing is a tax scheme whereby the Federal government pays people who speculate on property money, thereby making property prices more expensive and collecting less tax revenue. This is done under the guise of “encouraging investing”, even though there is no investment done at all since nothing new is produced at all, in particular no new properties are built as a result. Given the absurdity of this notion you would think it’d be the first thing any reasonable government would cut from the budget, but not when vested interests and corruption are in play.